Американский независимый технопортал NRDC, объединивший специалистов по выявлению энергоэффективности потребительских устройств и оценивающих их влияние на экологическую ситуацию в глобальном масштабе, опубликовал результаты тестирования наиболее распространённых в США смарт-телевизоров различных производителей. За исключением Samsung и LG, показавших лучшие результаты в плане энергосбережения, все остальные участники подверглись острой критике за наплевательское отношение к этому важнейшему показателю.
Напомним, что лидер ТВ-индустрии Samsung, как и его ближайший конкурент LG, используют собственные смарт-платформы TIZEN и WebOS, в то время как большинство более мелких игроков зависят от софта, поставляемого компанией Google (Android TV), Fire TV от Amazon или платформ Roku TV и Smartcast OS. Как оказалось, в режиме ожидания (он же известен как режим "стэндбай"), когда аппарат выключен, но не отключён от электророзетки, большинство телеприёмников (за исключением вышеупомянутых Samsung и LG) остаются весьма прожорливыми, поскольку продолжают "жить своей жизнью" (подобно Android-смартфонам), постоянно собирая и отправляя информацию на серверы компаний-производителей и поставщиков приложений через подключённый интернет-канал.
В качестве подтверждения эксперты NRDC, исследовавшие 10 моделей телеприёмников, также ссылаются и на обширные исследования своих коллег из Северо-западного альянса энергоэффективности (NEEA), который протестировал около 40 различных моделей телевизоров как в рабочем режиме, так и в режиме ожидания. Ввиду того, что Samsung и LG удалось разработать высокоэффективные смарт-платформы, которые в состоянии "сна" потребляют не больше, чем обычный ТВ без смарт-функций, они были исключены из дальнейшей программы тестирования ввиду полного соответствия экологическим нормам.
Напомним, что количество используемых в Северной Америке телевизоров марки Samsung и LG составляет около половины от всего парка таких устройств. Поэтому всё дальнейшее внимание экспертов сосредоточилось на нерадивых поставщиках "второго эшелона", куда попала даже корпорация Sony, использующая платформу Android от Google, и в очередной раз отличившуюся крайне низкими показателями в плане энергосбережения.
Поскольку Google с помощью своей Android OS хочет следить за её пользователями круглосуточно, компания под предлогом наличия функции "интеллектуального пробуждения" (то есть включения телевизора по голосовой команде) фактически не выключает телеприёмник, а лишь "гасит экран". То есть телевизор продолжает активно пожирать энергию, чтобы всего-навсего обеспечить функцию голосового включения на следующее утро. При этом всю ночь продолжается "интеллектуальное сканирование" помещения, где расположен телеприёмник на предмет улавливания той самой "голосовой команды". На практике это означает, что клиента прослушивают постоянно (включая его "разговоры в постели", если ТВ установлен в спальне) через микрофон в пульте ДУ или через микрофон, непосредственно встроенный в телевизор. Некоторые "особо продвинутые" модели вообще требуют "интеллектуального подключения" через смартфон или смарт-колонку. В таком случае прожорливость телевизора увеличивается ещё больше. По такой схеме действуют многие нерадивые производители ТВ (особенно китайские), которые снижают цены на свою продукцию за счёт возможности последующей продажи собранных данных о пользователе сторонним компаниям (а в тоталитарных странах параллельно идёт слив информации спецслужбам). При этом владельцы таких телевизоров будут приплачивать немалые суммы (до 75%!) энергокомпаниям.
В глобальном масштабе подобные действия вполне можно рассматривать как стихийное бедствие, поскольку почти миллиард "неэкологичных" смарт-ТВ, эксплуатирующихся в мире, требуют дополнительного сжигания нефтегазовых ресурсов в астрономических объёмах, констатируют эксперты NRDC. Это ведёт в повышенным выбросам углекислого газа в атмосферу планеты. Так что поговорка "скупой платит дважды" здесь вполне уместна.
Авторы исследования призывают компании, выпускающие "отсталые" смарт-ТВ, как можно скорее исправить недостатки на программном или аппаратном уровне, однако это вряд ли произойдёт в обозримом будущем. "Корпорация добра" Google хочет знать о вас всё, и за это придётся платить.
Полный оригинальный текст о результатах исследования, проведённого специалистами NRDC и NEEA, мы публикуем ниже:
If you are not the proud owner of a Samsung or LG smart TV, then get ready to pay more for your electricity consumption
The American independent technology portal NRDC, which brings together experts in identifying the energy efficiency of consumer devices and assessing their impact on the environmental situation on a global scale, has published the results of testing the most common smart TVs from various manufacturers in the United States. With the exception of Samsung and LG, which showed the best results in terms of energy saving, all other participants were sharply criticized for disregarding this most important indicator.
We publish the full original text on the results of the research conducted by the NRDC and NEEA specialists below:
Your Smart TV May Have Insomnia and Guzzle Power When “Off”
While the energy efficiency of America’s smart televisions has improved greatly since flat panel models were first introduced, some of the energy savings are at risk due to new “smart wake” features that can waste a lot of power when the TV is in standby mode. These features provide the user with the convenience of waking their TV through a voice command to a nearby smart speaker, or to seamlessly shift from watching content on a tablet or phone to the TV, without using a remote control. Our extensive laboratory testing on the standby power of 10 different models found that in many cases, enabling these features caused a TV’s overall annual electricity consumption to skyrocket by as much as 75%.
All that extra standby power adds up. NRDC estimates it will cost purchasers of 2021 TVs who enable smart wake features an additional $750 million on their utility bills over these TVs’ seven-year lifetime, barring future manufacturer design improvements. The extra electricity consumption also will lead to more than 3 million tons of additional carbon dioxide emissions.
Spoiler alert, Samsung and LG TVs have found a way to support smart wake on their internet-connected televisions WITHOUT a noticeable increase in standby power levels. Other models we tested, however, were like vampires continuously guzzling electricity while waiting to be fully awakened.
What are “smart wake” features?
The vast majority of new TVs offer the user the ability to be connected wirelessly to a smart speaker like the Amazon Echo (which many simply call Alexa). The user can then wake or control the TV simply with voice commands by saying things like, “Alexa turn on the TV” or “OK Google, turn on the Knicks game.” Another option is “wake by cast,” which allows a user who is viewing a movie or show on a tablet or phone to click on the little casting icon, and their TV will quickly wake and display the same content. Lastly, users can download an app to turn their phone into a virtual remote control that can wake and control their TV. These three features are forms of “smart wake” that avoid the hassle of having to locate and use a remote control.
How did we test the TVs?
NRDC partnered with Pacific Crest Laboratories (PCL) for the first in-depth study of the standby power of different TVs when these features were enabled. Most of the ten TVs we tested required the user to go into the menu and turn on/enable the smart wake features. Each manufacturer had its own terminology for the settings and in some cases, the user needed to select the Quick Start feature for things to operate properly. We tested a range of TV brands, both major and small, as well as a variety of operating systems (e.g., Roku, Android TV, Amazon Fire TV, etc.) that these TVs are controlled by.
Prior to testing we connected the TV to a live internet signal and downloaded the latest software update. After displaying video content, we turned off the TV and measured its standby power. We then configured the TV so the smart wake features were enabled, including selecting wake on cast and linking the smart speaker to the TV via a wireless connection.
Subsequently, we confirmed whether the smart wake features worked and measured the TV’s standby power for 40 minutes. Given that TVs may not fully power down for several minutes, we waited 20 minutes before starting our measurements and then recorded the average standby power over the next 20 minutes.
What impact did smart wake have on TV standby power?
The average standby power level of TVs tested without any smart wake features enabled was 0.6 watts. Once we turned on the smart wake features, standby power levels jumped dramatically. This table shows the brands tested, along with their operating system (OS). Some of the operating systems like Android TV are used by multiple manufacturers, whereas LG and Samsung have their own proprietary operating systems, WebOS and TIZEN, respectively. Two things to note: a) Samsung and LG TVs supported smart wake features without a noticeable increase in standby power; and b) for all the other TVs tested we saw standby power levels from roughly 5 to 20 watts. We conferred with the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA), which has tested roughly 40 TVs in both on and standby modes and done lots of great work in this space, and reported an average standby power level of 12.5 watts for models that showed elevated standby power levels with smart wake. (We used this value in our modelling discussed above.)
In follow-up conversations with Vizio, we learned that their TVs support wake by phone (using the phone as a remote control) when their TV is in the default Eco Mode setting and were able to achieve standby power level of less than 1 watt. The 14.4-watt level in the table was based on testing with the Vizio TV’s Quick Start setting selected as that was required to get their wake by cast and wake by voice features to work properly.
National Impacts
NRDC and PCL developed a model to quantify the national impact of smart wake features. We excluded Samsung and LG TVs, which together represent just under half of U.S. market share, as they did not show elevated smart wake standby levels. We assumed an incremental standby power level of 11.9 watts, and that half of all users would configure their TVs to use one or more of the smart wake features. (Note: this article shows half of smart speaker owners connect them to TVs. While we don’t know exactly what percentage use wake by cast or wake by phone, we believe it’s significant and likely to grow as the manufacturers make these features easier to use and consumers become more aware of them.)
On a per TV basis, we assumed an average TV draws around 60 watts of electricity in active use and 0.6 watts in standby. Assuming a duty cycle of 5 hours on and 19 hours off per day, this translates to an annual energy use of 108 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. If that same TV had smart wake enabled and drew 12.5 watts in standby, its annual energy use jumped to 191 kWh/yr.—an increase of 76.3 percent. Over the TV’s typical 7-year lifetime, it will consume an extra $75 of electricity, and twice that in areas with higher utility rates, like California and Hawaii.
We then quantified the national impacts by assuming that half of the 40 million TVs sold in the U.S. each year have inefficient smart wake designs, and half of those have smart wake enabled. The incremental energy used by these 10 million TVs over their lifetime adds up to:
* 5,777-gigawatt hours (GWh) of additional electricity use, which is equivalent to the annual output of two large (500 megawatt) coal-burning power plants
$750 million in higher consumer utility bills
* Over 3 million tons of CO2 emissions
* To put all this extra energy use into perspective, it’s roughly equivalent to one year’s worth of electricity consumption by all the households in Portland, OR and Tampa combined!
All of these impacts are just for the U.S. market and become a lot larger when international sales are considered.
Where to from here?
The good news from this study is that two TV manufacturers already demonstrated that a TV can support all these smart wake features with no energy or performance penalty. We hope our study serves as a call to action for other manufacturers to work with their operating system vendors to provide a good user experience with these smart wake features enabled while achieving similar low standby power levels.
Our policy level recommendations include:
* The test method used by manufacturers and regulators to measure the energy use of TVs must be updated to ensure the TV is connected to the internet during testing and with smart wake features enabled, and that the increased standby power use this may cause is captured and reported.
* The Environmental Protection Agency should update its test method and eligibility criteria for ENERGY STAR® to ensure TVs that qualify for the label have low standby power levels, including when smart wake features are enabled.
* The Federal Trade Commission should update the testing and reporting instructions for its yellow ENERGY GUIDE label, which compares the energy use and operating costs of similar sized TVs.
As a result of our research and conversations with some of the manufacturers and companies that develop the operating systems, we believe these entities now understand this issue and appear committed to trying to make the necessary changes.
Let’s hope that in the not too distant future the other TV manufacturers make the necessary software fixes so they catch up to Samsung and LG and we can prevent this unnecessary energy waste and the pollution that comes with it. That’s something worth tuning into!
